Timeshare Solutions Plus advertises cancellation services with an estimated timeline of 12 to 16 months. On the surface, they present themselves as another company offering assistance to owners seeking an exit from their timeshare obligations. But once we began looking deeper, their story became a bit more layered than it first appears.

They maintain a blog dating back to 2018, which may suggest longevity. However, there is an important distinction to make: they were not operating as Timeshare Solutions Plus under that name in 2018. This becomes relevant when examining how the company has evolved over time, particularly through multiple branding changes.

One detail that may surprise some readers is that they are BBB accredited and currently show relatively minimal complaint activity compared with many companies in the same industry. While there are not many review platforms carrying significant customer feedback about them, the complaints that do exist generally appear to have been addressed or resolved. That alone does not guarantee quality, but it does separate them somewhat from companies that ignore consumer disputes entirely.

Their online presence, however, feels inconsistent. They have maintained several social media accounts, including TikTok (last active in 2024), Instagram (last active in 2022), and Facebook (also last active in 2022). So while these accounts exist, they do not appear heavily maintained or actively used for customer engagement. To us, it gives more of a placeholder presence than a polished modern brand strategy.

Another interesting thread appears through search results linking them to the name ClearPath Consulting Services. Whether this is an alternate business name, a related entity, or simply an unrelated overlap is not entirely clear. The only visible connection we found was through online discussion comparisons. ClearPath itself has also been associated elsewhere with Serenity 1, though that trail does not appear especially relevant to Timeshare Solutions Plus directly. Still, it adds another layer of ambiguity.

Where things become more intriguing is at the bottom of the Timeshare Solutions Plus website, where the domain smartstarttimeshare.com appears. Clicking it today redirects users back to the current Timeshare Solutions Plus website. But when reviewing BBB records, another clue emerges: the listed owner of Timeshare Solutions Plus, Yvette Carsten, was also connected to Smart Start Services. That company is now listed as out of business. No active complaints or reviews remain visible there, though records indicate it was established in 2020.

The deeper history of the “Smart Start Timeshare” name stretches even further back. Around 2012, it appears to have functioned as an informational website discussing timeshare resale scams and warning consumers about resale companies. Older social media pages from that era seem to have disappeared or were never properly archived.

Then, by 2016, the site reportedly went offline for renovations. In 2017, it resurfaced under the name Timeshare Repeal, with a website layout strikingly similar to what is now used by Timeshare Solutions Plus. That branding appears to have lasted until roughly 2022, when the Smart Start domain began redirecting to the current company name.

So naturally, we have to ask: why so many name changes?

We do not know for certain. Sometimes rebranding happens for legitimate reasons—ownership changes, marketing refreshes, mergers, or shifts in services. Other times, repeated rebranding can raise eyebrows, especially in an industry already known for consumer skepticism. In this case, Smart Start was reportedly marked bankrupt through BBB records, and what began as an informational resource appears to have transformed into an exit company model over time.

So, is Timeshare Solutions Plus suspicious?

Possibly—but not conclusively. What exists publicly today does not clearly paint the picture of an outright scam. They appear more transparent than many competitors when it comes to complaint visibility, and most disputes seem to have reached some level of resolution. At the same time, limited public history, multiple brand transitions, and unclear business connections leave questions that cautious consumers may want answered before signing anything.

Our Verdict: There is simply not enough public information to fully endorse or fully condemn them. What little exists suggests at least some degree of legitimacy, but also enough unusual history to justify careful due diligence. If you are considering them, we would strongly recommend reviewing contracts closely, asking detailed questions, and comparing them with other options before making a commitment.