Owners Financial Services Review

Owners Financial Services may appear on the surface to have been around for nearly a decade—their Facebook dates back to 2015—but outside of that, their presence is surprisingly thin. This lack of visibility alone raises some red flags, as if the company exists more on paper than in practice.

Their online reputation is another puzzle. On Facebook, the only review available vaguely praises them for helping to “move away from the asset promptly,” but offers no real detail. Google, on the other hand, paints a suspiciously perfect picture with overwhelmingly positive reviews. Yet, digging deeper reveals a troubling pattern: negative reviews seem to disappear.

According to one surviving critical review, the company actively reports unfavorable feedback to Google, dismissing it as “slander” or blaming “competitors.” The reviewer even claimed that three prior negative reviews were removed altogether, suggesting Owners Financial Services may have successfully manipulated their online image.

The company leans heavily on dramatic phrasing, frequently labeling timeshares as “toxic assets” and advertising their specialty as the “dissolution of toxic assets.” Their website even includes a testimonials section, though none of the quotes are verifiable, just anonymous text with no real sources, which does little to build trust.

Aside from these questionable practices, Owners Financial Services claims they do not charge upfront fees and offer free consultations, both common hooks in the timeshare exit industry. Still, considering their weak social media presence, unverifiable testimonials, and suspicious review patterns, it’s hard not to wonder: how does a little-known firm with virtually no public outreach manage to inspire such glowing feedback?

At the end of the day, while there’s no direct proof of fraudulent activity, the inconsistencies surrounding Owners Financial Services should make potential clients pause. With questionable transparency and a tendency to curate their image aggressively, approaching this company requires caution.

Rating: 2.5 stars, more questions than answers.